Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
741 to 760 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Composite GST assessment orders covering five distinct tax periods are unsustainable. Separate notices must be issued for each respective tax period, and the taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing before fresh assessment action is taken. The High Court declined to examine the assessment merits and set aside the composite order, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within the stipulated period. On default, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each tax period.
Composite GST assessment orders covering five distinct tax periods are unsustainable. Separate notices must be issued for each respective tax period, and the taxpayer must receive an opportunity of hearing before fresh assessment action is taken. The High Court declined to examine the assessment merits and set aside the composite order, subject to deposit of 20% of the disputed tax within the stipulated period. On default, the authorities may proceed in accordance with law. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each tax period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
