Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the PMLA, a provisional attachment cannot be confirmed by relying on a subsequent FIR absent from the recorded reasons to believe, attachment order, and original complaint. Such an FIR may create a separate basis for fresh attachment but cannot retrospectively validate an earlier attachment. Attachment of alleged proceeds of crime also cannot continue once the underlying scheduled offences are not established or no longer survive. Quashing of the foundational FIRs or filing of closure reports extinguishes the basis for PMLA proceedings and consequential attachment. On these grounds, the provisional attachment and its confirmation were set aside.
Under the PMLA, a provisional attachment cannot be confirmed by relying on a subsequent FIR absent from the recorded reasons to believe, attachment order, and original complaint. Such an FIR may create a separate basis for fresh attachment but cannot retrospectively validate an earlier attachment. Attachment of alleged proceeds of crime also cannot continue once the underlying scheduled offences are not established or no longer survive. Quashing of the foundational FIRs or filing of closure reports extinguishes the basis for PMLA proceedings and consequential attachment. On these grounds, the provisional attachment and its confirmation were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
