Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Attachment of property held by a person not accused of money laundering requires proof that proceeds of crime reached that person and funded acquisition of the property, or that the property constitutes equivalent-value property of a person involved in laundering. Alleged control of the purchasing company by an accused, based mainly on witness statements, does not replace evidence of a money trail. Bank-financed acquisition and the company's own savings were not shown to be proceeds of crime, layered proceeds, or assets belonging to the accused. The provisional attachment and its confirmation were therefore set aside.
Attachment of property held by a person not accused of money laundering requires proof that proceeds of crime reached that person and funded acquisition of the property, or that the property constitutes equivalent-value property of a person involved in laundering. Alleged control of the purchasing company by an accused, based mainly on witness statements, does not replace evidence of a money trail. Bank-financed acquisition and the company's own savings were not shown to be proceeds of crime, layered proceeds, or assets belonging to the accused. The provisional attachment and its confirmation were therefore set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
