<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Third-party property attachment requires proof of a money trail or equivalent-value liability, not alleged control alone.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102814</link>
    <description>Attachment of property held by a person not accused of money laundering requires proof that proceeds of crime reached that person and funded acquisition of the property, or that the property constitutes equivalent-value property of a person involved in laundering. Alleged control of the purchasing company by an accused, based mainly on witness statements, does not replace evidence of a money trail. Bank-financed acquisition and the company&#039;s own savings were not shown to be proceeds of crime, layered proceeds, or assets belonging to the accused. The provisional attachment and its confirmation were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Third-party property attachment requires proof of a money trail or equivalent-value liability, not alleged control alone.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102814</link>
      <description>Attachment of property held by a person not accused of money laundering requires proof that proceeds of crime reached that person and funded acquisition of the property, or that the property constitutes equivalent-value property of a person involved in laundering. Alleged control of the purchasing company by an accused, based mainly on witness statements, does not replace evidence of a money trail. Bank-financed acquisition and the company&#039;s own savings were not shown to be proceeds of crime, layered proceeds, or assets belonging to the accused. The provisional attachment and its confirmation were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>