Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.
Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.