<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Binding interim judicial directions precluded TDS default liability on Leave Travel Concession reimbursements involving foreign travel.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102696</link>
    <description>Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:33:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Binding interim judicial directions precluded TDS default liability on Leave Travel Concession reimbursements involving foreign travel.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102696</link>
      <description>Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:33:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102696</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>