Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.
Binding interim High Court directions treating Leave Travel Concession reimbursements as non-income for TDS purposes prevented bank branches from being treated as assessees in default for non-deduction on reimbursements involving foreign travel. Section 201 liability arises only where tax was not deducted despite a subsisting legal obligation. Compliance with operative interim directions eclipsed that obligation for the relevant period, even though employees remained liable if the writ petition failed. A subsequent merits decision on the exemption issue could not retrospectively impose default liability. Consequently, demands for default and related interest were set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.