Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fresh GST proceedings under Section 74 may be initiated within two years from communication of an earlier writ order that quashed a prior notice while expressly permitting fresh action, provided fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax exists. Section 75(3), read with that binding direction, preserves the period for consequential adjudication; an earlier dropped Section 73 notice does not bar the fresh proceedings. However, a show cause notice containing unnecessary accusations that the taxpayer misled the Court demonstrates prejudgment and breaches the requirement of neutral adjudication. Such a notice must be set aside, with any fresh action undertaken by a different officer.
Fresh GST proceedings under Section 74 may be initiated within two years from communication of an earlier writ order that quashed a prior notice while expressly permitting fresh action, provided fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax exists. Section 75(3), read with that binding direction, preserves the period for consequential adjudication; an earlier dropped Section 73 notice does not bar the fresh proceedings. However, a show cause notice containing unnecessary accusations that the taxpayer misled the Court demonstrates prejudgment and breaches the requirement of neutral adjudication. Such a notice must be set aside, with any fresh action undertaken by a different officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
