Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Reassessment under the amended scheme may be initiated where portal information links transactions to an assessee's PAN, provided the material is relevant and the assessing authority applies its mind to objections. Detailed reasons to believe are not required at the initiation stage. A GST communication does not bar an independent income-tax enquiry where identity theft has not been conclusively established. Reassessment may therefore continue, while the identity-theft defence remains open for examination. Although the assessee must substantiate that plea with evidence, the Revenue must first establish through positive primary evidence that the disputed transactions were undertaken by the assessee rather than another person.
Reassessment under the amended scheme may be initiated where portal information links transactions to an assessee's PAN, provided the material is relevant and the assessing authority applies its mind to objections. Detailed reasons to believe are not required at the initiation stage. A GST communication does not bar an independent income-tax enquiry where identity theft has not been conclusively established. Reassessment may therefore continue, while the identity-theft defence remains open for examination. Although the assessee must substantiate that plea with evidence, the Revenue must first establish through positive primary evidence that the disputed transactions were undertaken by the assessee rather than another person.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
