Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Reassessment under the amended scheme may be initiated where portal information links transactions to an assessee's PAN, provided the material is relevant and the assessing authority applies its mind to objections. Detailed reasons to believe are not required at the initiation stage. A GST communication does not bar an independent income-tax enquiry where identity theft has not been conclusively established. Reassessment may therefore continue, while the identity-theft defence remains open for examination. Although the assessee must substantiate that plea with evidence, the Revenue must first establish through positive primary evidence that the disputed transactions were undertaken by the assessee rather than another person.
Reassessment under the amended scheme may be initiated where portal information links transactions to an assessee's PAN, provided the material is relevant and the assessing authority applies its mind to objections. Detailed reasons to believe are not required at the initiation stage. A GST communication does not bar an independent income-tax enquiry where identity theft has not been conclusively established. Reassessment may therefore continue, while the identity-theft defence remains open for examination. Although the assessee must substantiate that plea with evidence, the Revenue must first establish through positive primary evidence that the disputed transactions were undertaken by the assessee rather than another person.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
