Condonation of refiling delay refused where repeated defects, lack of diligence and vague explanations defeated the appeal against resolution plan app...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4301 to 4320 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Where an assessee disputes stamp-duty valuation under section 56(2)(x), distinguishes the valuation of different portions of the property, and requests a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer, the Assessing Officer must make that reference before adopting the stamp-duty value. The basement and ground floor could not be valued on the same basis without addressing the assessee's objections through a reasoned finding. Adoption of the stamp-duty valuation without a valuation reference was therefore unjustified, and the addition for the difference between declared purchase consideration and stamp-duty value was deleted to the assessee's share.
Where an assessee disputes stamp-duty valuation under section 56(2)(x), distinguishes the valuation of different portions of the property, and requests a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer, the Assessing Officer must make that reference before adopting the stamp-duty value. The basement and ground floor could not be valued on the same basis without addressing the assessee's objections through a reasoned finding. Adoption of the stamp-duty valuation without a valuation reference was therefore unjustified, and the addition for the difference between declared purchase consideration and stamp-duty value was deleted to the assessee's share.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
