<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Stamp-duty valuation disputes require a valuation reference when requested, preventing unsupported additions under section 56(2)(x).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102544</link>
    <description>Where an assessee disputes stamp-duty valuation under section 56(2)(x), distinguishes the valuation of different portions of the property, and requests a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer, the Assessing Officer must make that reference before adopting the stamp-duty value. The basement and ground floor could not be valued on the same basis without addressing the assessee&#039;s objections through a reasoned finding. Adoption of the stamp-duty valuation without a valuation reference was therefore unjustified, and the addition for the difference between declared purchase consideration and stamp-duty value was deleted to the assessee&#039;s share.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:12:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:12:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=916270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Stamp-duty valuation disputes require a valuation reference when requested, preventing unsupported additions under section 56(2)(x).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102544</link>
      <description>Where an assessee disputes stamp-duty valuation under section 56(2)(x), distinguishes the valuation of different portions of the property, and requests a reference to the Departmental Valuation Officer, the Assessing Officer must make that reference before adopting the stamp-duty value. The basement and ground floor could not be valued on the same basis without addressing the assessee&#039;s objections through a reasoned finding. Adoption of the stamp-duty valuation without a valuation reference was therefore unjustified, and the addition for the difference between declared purchase consideration and stamp-duty value was deleted to the assessee&#039;s share.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:12:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>