Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Reassessment proceedings initiated by a notice under section 148 treat the return filed in response as a return under section 139. A notice under section 143(2) is required only where the Assessing Officer considers verification necessary or expedient; its absence does not by itself invalidate reassessment, particularly where the taxpayer participated in the proceedings and section 292BB applies. Additions made during reassessment must retain a direct nexus with the recorded reasons for reopening. Where a claimed business loss is set off against unreported non-compete income forming the basis for reopening, examination of that loss is connected to the recorded reasons; the substantive justification remains examinable in statutory appeal.
Reassessment proceedings initiated by a notice under section 148 treat the return filed in response as a return under section 139. A notice under section 143(2) is required only where the Assessing Officer considers verification necessary or expedient; its absence does not by itself invalidate reassessment, particularly where the taxpayer participated in the proceedings and section 292BB applies. Additions made during reassessment must retain a direct nexus with the recorded reasons for reopening. Where a claimed business loss is set off against unreported non-compete income forming the basis for reopening, examination of that loss is connected to the recorded reasons; the substantive justification remains examinable in statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.