Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision under section 263 cannot extend to matters already considered in an appeal: where the appeal covered the genuineness of purchases and profit estimation, Explanation 1(c) barred revision on those purchases. Revision also cannot substitute the Commissioner's view for the Assessing Officer's plausible view after inquiry; having examined supporting documents and estimated only the profit element in unverifiable purchases, the assessment could not be revised to tax the entire purchases as unexplained expenditure. Further, a supplier's non-genuineness alone does not establish remission or cessation of a trading liability, so the outstanding credit could not be taxed on that basis. The revisionary order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Revision under section 263 cannot extend to matters already considered in an appeal: where the appeal covered the genuineness of purchases and profit estimation, Explanation 1(c) barred revision on those purchases. Revision also cannot substitute the Commissioner's view for the Assessing Officer's plausible view after inquiry; having examined supporting documents and estimated only the profit element in unverifiable purchases, the assessment could not be revised to tax the entire purchases as unexplained expenditure. Further, a supplier's non-genuineness alone does not establish remission or cessation of a trading liability, so the outstanding credit could not be taxed on that basis. The revisionary order was set aside and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
