<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revisionary jurisdiction is barred for appealed purchase issues and cannot replace a plausible assessment after inquiry.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102470</link>
    <description>Revision under section 263 cannot extend to matters already considered in an appeal: where the appeal covered the genuineness of purchases and profit estimation, Explanation 1(c) barred revision on those purchases. Revision also cannot substitute the Commissioner&#039;s view for the Assessing Officer&#039;s plausible view after inquiry; having examined supporting documents and estimated only the profit element in unverifiable purchases, the assessment could not be revised to tax the entire purchases as unexplained expenditure. Further, a supplier&#039;s non-genuineness alone does not establish remission or cessation of a trading liability, so the outstanding credit could not be taxed on that basis. The revisionary order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=915827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revisionary jurisdiction is barred for appealed purchase issues and cannot replace a plausible assessment after inquiry.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102470</link>
      <description>Revision under section 263 cannot extend to matters already considered in an appeal: where the appeal covered the genuineness of purchases and profit estimation, Explanation 1(c) barred revision on those purchases. Revision also cannot substitute the Commissioner&#039;s view for the Assessing Officer&#039;s plausible view after inquiry; having examined supporting documents and estimated only the profit element in unverifiable purchases, the assessment could not be revised to tax the entire purchases as unexplained expenditure. Further, a supplier&#039;s non-genuineness alone does not establish remission or cessation of a trading liability, so the outstanding credit could not be taxed on that basis. The revisionary order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:07:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>