Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An amount paid at import remains a refundable deposit where the bill of entry is unfinalised, no out-of-charge order for home consumption is issued, and the amount is not appropriated as customs duty. The imported pillow and duvet goods failed statutory quarantine requirements and were destroyed before clearance. As redemption fine and penalty were separately imposed and paid for the goods-related illegality, the pre-clearance deposit could not be retained as duty. The refund denial was set aside, and refund was granted with consequential relief in accordance with law.
An amount paid at import remains a refundable deposit where the bill of entry is unfinalised, no out-of-charge order for home consumption is issued, and the amount is not appropriated as customs duty. The imported pillow and duvet goods failed statutory quarantine requirements and were destroyed before clearance. As redemption fine and penalty were separately imposed and paid for the goods-related illegality, the pre-clearance deposit could not be retained as duty. The refund denial was set aside, and refund was granted with consequential relief in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
