Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of valid prior liquidation steps.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.