Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of valid prior liquidation steps.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
