Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of valid prior liquidation steps.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Section 34 treats continuation of the resolution professional as liquidator as the default position, while replacement is limited to specified statutory grounds. A Committee of Creditors' unanimous recommendation for a liquidator is material and requires consideration; a general bar on appointing an erstwhile interim or resolution professional is not supported where the underlying facts do not apply. Appointment also requires verification of a valid and subsisting Authorisation for Assignment before charge is assumed. Routine liquidation steps taken by an incumbent may remain effective, while the outgoing liquidator may receive costs and fees for work genuinely performed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.