Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3061 to 3080 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A Special Leave Petition concerning whether NIPL or a liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India, and the resulting taxability and income attribution, was not considered on merits. The Supreme Court found the reasons for the 383-day delay in filing insufficient in law and dismissed the condonation application and the petition. It noted that, in a matter involving the same respondents and issues, an earlier petition had already been dismissed for gross delay, and stated that the later filing could have been avoided.
A Special Leave Petition concerning whether NIPL or a liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India, and the resulting taxability and income attribution, was not considered on merits. The Supreme Court found the reasons for the 383-day delay in filing insufficient in law and dismissed the condonation application and the petition. It noted that, in a matter involving the same respondents and issues, an earlier petition had already been dismissed for gross delay, and stated that the later filing could have been avoided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
