https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102285 A Special Leave Petition concerning whether NIPL or a liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India, and the resulting taxability and income attribution, was not considered on merits. The Supreme Court found the reasons for the 383-day delay in filing insufficient in law and dismissed the condonation application and the petition. It noted that, in a matter involving the same respondents and issues, an earlier petition had already been dismissed for gross delay, and stated that the later filing could have been avoided. en-us Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:29 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102285 A Special Leave Petition concerning whether NIPL or a liaison office constituted a fixed place permanent establishment in India, and the resulting taxability and income attribution, was not considered on merits. The Supreme Court found the reasons for the 383-day delay in filing insufficient in law and dismissed the condonation application and the petition. It noted that, in a matter involving the same respondents and issues, an earlier petition had already been dismissed for gross delay, and stated that the later filing could have been avoided. Highlights Income Tax Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:29 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102285