Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Income recognised on completion of consultancy services and invoicing should not be taxed again merely because the related tax credit appears in Form 26AS in a later year; the reported addition was deleted after reconciliation of the invoices. Property-transfer charges and commission, although not deductible as business expenditure, were to be considered in computing capital gains because they related to the sale. Professional fees claimed for arranging working-capital funding required proof of their business utility; in the absence of adequate substantiation, only part of the claim was allowed and half was disallowed. The appeal was partly allowed.
Income recognised on completion of consultancy services and invoicing should not be taxed again merely because the related tax credit appears in Form 26AS in a later year; the reported addition was deleted after reconciliation of the invoices. Property-transfer charges and commission, although not deductible as business expenditure, were to be considered in computing capital gains because they related to the sale. Professional fees claimed for arranging working-capital funding required proof of their business utility; in the absence of adequate substantiation, only part of the claim was allowed and half was disallowed. The appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.