<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accrual-based consultancy income cannot be taxed twice merely because Form 26AS reflects tax credit in a later year.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102277</link>
    <description>Income recognised on completion of consultancy services and invoicing should not be taxed again merely because the related tax credit appears in Form 26AS in a later year; the reported addition was deleted after reconciliation of the invoices. Property-transfer charges and commission, although not deductible as business expenditure, were to be considered in computing capital gains because they related to the sale. Professional fees claimed for arranging working-capital funding required proof of their business utility; in the absence of adequate substantiation, only part of the claim was allowed and half was disallowed. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accrual-based consultancy income cannot be taxed twice merely because Form 26AS reflects tax credit in a later year.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102277</link>
      <description>Income recognised on completion of consultancy services and invoicing should not be taxed again merely because the related tax credit appears in Form 26AS in a later year; the reported addition was deleted after reconciliation of the invoices. Property-transfer charges and commission, although not deductible as business expenditure, were to be considered in computing capital gains because they related to the sale. Professional fees claimed for arranging working-capital funding required proof of their business utility; in the absence of adequate substantiation, only part of the claim was allowed and half was disallowed. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 08:34:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>