Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft assessment order to file objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer; filing only with the Assessing Officer does not satisfy the statutory requirement. In the absence of Panel objections, the Assessing Officer may complete the assessment on the basis of the draft order under Section 144C(3). The note further states that a challenge to such final assessment should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appeal available under Section 246A, rather than writ jurisdiction where an efficacious appellate remedy exists. The reported writ petition was dismissed, with assessment merits left for appellate consideration.
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft assessment order to file objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer; filing only with the Assessing Officer does not satisfy the statutory requirement. In the absence of Panel objections, the Assessing Officer may complete the assessment on the basis of the draft order under Section 144C(3). The note further states that a challenge to such final assessment should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appeal available under Section 246A, rather than writ jurisdiction where an efficacious appellate remedy exists. The reported writ petition was dismissed, with assessment merits left for appellate consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.