Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95752 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft assessment order to file objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer; filing only with the Assessing Officer does not satisfy the statutory requirement. In the absence of Panel objections, the Assessing Officer may complete the assessment on the basis of the draft order under Section 144C(3). The note further states that a challenge to such final assessment should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appeal available under Section 246A, rather than writ jurisdiction where an efficacious appellate remedy exists. The reported writ petition was dismissed, with assessment merits left for appellate consideration.
Section 144C requires an eligible assessee challenging a draft assessment order to file objections with both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer; filing only with the Assessing Officer does not satisfy the statutory requirement. In the absence of Panel objections, the Assessing Officer may complete the assessment on the basis of the draft order under Section 144C(3). The note further states that a challenge to such final assessment should ordinarily proceed through the statutory appeal available under Section 246A, rather than writ jurisdiction where an efficacious appellate remedy exists. The reported writ petition was dismissed, with assessment merits left for appellate consideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.