Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed dues.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
