<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed dues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102234</link>
    <description>Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant&#039;s age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:27:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:27:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=914589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed dues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102234</link>
      <description>Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant&#039;s age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:27:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>