Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed dues.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
