Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4780
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 95596 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed dues.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Modification of bail conditions is not barred by Section 362 Cr.P.C. because a bail order is interlocutory and does not finally dispose of the criminal case. The notes state that a High Court may use inherent jurisdiction to vary such conditions where changed circumstances require intervention to secure the ends of justice. They further explain that bail conditions cannot operate as a mechanism to recover disputed dues before trial: a monetary deposit imposed without prima facie satisfaction of guilt may be unreasonably onerous. In the circumstances described, closure of proceedings against co-accused, absence of an early trial, and the applicant's age supported revocation of the fixed-deposit condition and release of the deposit with accrued interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
