Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
841 to 860 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Compulsory-acquisition compensation attributable to development rights transferred under a pre-existing development agreement is discussed as not accruing to the land-holding company where the developer held exclusive commercial rights, funded the acquisition, and bore development risks. The notes distinguish an overriding contractual obligation from an application of income after accrual. They further state that taxing the same transferred compensation again in the land-holder's hands, after its taxation in the developer's hands, would create impermissible double taxation without statutory authority. Consistent treatment is also identified as relevant where materially identical development arrangements have received different tax treatment.
Compulsory-acquisition compensation attributable to development rights transferred under a pre-existing development agreement is discussed as not accruing to the land-holding company where the developer held exclusive commercial rights, funded the acquisition, and bore development risks. The notes distinguish an overriding contractual obligation from an application of income after accrual. They further state that taxing the same transferred compensation again in the land-holder's hands, after its taxation in the developer's hands, would create impermissible double taxation without statutory authority. Consistent treatment is also identified as relevant where materially identical development arrangements have received different tax treatment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
