Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Marketing expenditure supported only by self-made vouchers may be disallowed where third-party evidence is absent, but a complete disallowance may be inappropriate when the expenditure is modest relative to turnover, relates to client visits and outstation costs, and audited books contain no adverse comments. The discussion notes that a restricted disallowance was sustained. It further explains that insufficient substantiation of an expenditure claim does not itself establish misreporting under section 270A unless a statutory category, such as misrepresentation, suppression of facts, lack of evidence, or a false book entry, is identified. The related misreporting penalty was deleted.
Marketing expenditure supported only by self-made vouchers may be disallowed where third-party evidence is absent, but a complete disallowance may be inappropriate when the expenditure is modest relative to turnover, relates to client visits and outstation costs, and audited books contain no adverse comments. The discussion notes that a restricted disallowance was sustained. It further explains that insufficient substantiation of an expenditure claim does not itself establish misreporting under section 270A unless a statutory category, such as misrepresentation, suppression of facts, lack of evidence, or a false book entry, is identified. The related misreporting penalty was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.