Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Extension or rejection of the warehousing period under the sufficient-cause standard is quasi-judicial, requiring a judicial approach and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that a denial must follow adjudicatory proceedings and be communicated through an appealable, reasoned order. Communications that merely convey rejection without findings or justification do not satisfy principles of natural justice. The Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension is also noted. On the stated facts, the rejection communications were considered prima facie unsustainable; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure of proposed reasons, opportunity to reply and personal hearing, while consequential proceedings remained in abeyance.
Extension or rejection of the warehousing period under the sufficient-cause standard is quasi-judicial, requiring a judicial approach and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that a denial must follow adjudicatory proceedings and be communicated through an appealable, reasoned order. Communications that merely convey rejection without findings or justification do not satisfy principles of natural justice. The Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension is also noted. On the stated facts, the rejection communications were considered prima facie unsustainable; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure of proposed reasons, opportunity to reply and personal hearing, while consequential proceedings remained in abeyance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.