Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Extension or rejection of the warehousing period under the sufficient-cause standard is quasi-judicial, requiring a judicial approach and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that a denial must follow adjudicatory proceedings and be communicated through an appealable, reasoned order. Communications that merely convey rejection without findings or justification do not satisfy principles of natural justice. The Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension is also noted. On the stated facts, the rejection communications were considered prima facie unsustainable; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure of proposed reasons, opportunity to reply and personal hearing, while consequential proceedings remained in abeyance.
Extension or rejection of the warehousing period under the sufficient-cause standard is quasi-judicial, requiring a judicial approach and an opportunity of hearing. The notes state that a denial must follow adjudicatory proceedings and be communicated through an appealable, reasoned order. Communications that merely convey rejection without findings or justification do not satisfy principles of natural justice. The Supreme Court's COVID-19 limitation extension is also noted. On the stated facts, the rejection communications were considered prima facie unsustainable; the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after disclosure of proposed reasons, opportunity to reply and personal hearing, while consequential proceedings remained in abeyance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.