Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Interactive flat panels meeting automatic data processing conditions are distinguished from monitors, while later classification clarifications apply ...
Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.
Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4780
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
