<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Full and true disclosure bars reassessment beyond four years where reopening rests only on a changed view of disclosed facts.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102111</link>
    <description>Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913662" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Full and true disclosure bars reassessment beyond four years where reopening rests only on a changed view of disclosed facts.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102111</link>
      <description>Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 08:27:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102111</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>