Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.
Reopening a completed scrutiny assessment beyond four years requires escapement of income to be attributable to the assessee's failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Where the immovable-property sale, sale consideration and explanation for the additional stamp-duty value were examined and disclosed in the original assessment, the recorded reasons must identify a material fact withheld by the assessee. A later different view on the same material, including the applicability of the stamp-duty valuation provision, amounts to a change of opinion and cannot meet the jurisdictional condition. The reassessment notice and consequential proceedings were therefore quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
