Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Deduction under section 54F is described as available where an assessee purchases a qualifying residential property from a spouse or other relative, provided the transaction is legally valid and genuine. The notes state that tax benefit alone does not make an intra-family transaction a colourable device, and deduction cannot be denied on suspicion without material establishing a legal flaw. They further state that a spouse's later set-off of capital gains against business losses could not have been anticipated when the property transaction occurred and therefore did not justify denial. On this reasoning, the stated conclusion is that the section 54F disallowance was deleted and the appeal allowed.
Deduction under section 54F is described as available where an assessee purchases a qualifying residential property from a spouse or other relative, provided the transaction is legally valid and genuine. The notes state that tax benefit alone does not make an intra-family transaction a colourable device, and deduction cannot be denied on suspicion without material establishing a legal flaw. They further state that a spouse's later set-off of capital gains against business losses could not have been anticipated when the property transaction occurred and therefore did not justify denial. On this reasoning, the stated conclusion is that the section 54F disallowance was deleted and the appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
