Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration...
Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mismanagement.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
