Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration...
Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mismanagement.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
