Specialized Investment Fund distribution now requires dedicated certification, while transitional recognition preserves existing qualified distributor...
Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration...
Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mismanagement.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
A memorandum contemplating future finalisation of consideration and a subsequent share transfer did not complete a transfer of the company's shareholding. In the absence of an executed share transfer deed, endorsed share certificates and statutory compliance, later retrospective filings could not displace contemporaneous records showing the existing shareholders. Similarly, book entries against an unsecured interest-free loan could not transfer the company's immovable property without a registered conveyance, particularly where the alleged transferee continued paying rent. Retrospective manipulation of corporate records, attempted usurpation of shareholding and removal of the sole asset prejudiced members and constituted continuing oppression and mismanagement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
