Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Money-laundering prosecution is described as requiring a scheduled offence, proceeds of crime generated from that offence, and their projection as untainted, including knowing assistance in related processes. Challenges to investigation or discharge grounds in predicate offences are presented as outside the scope of the money-laundering proceeding. The notes explain that discharge requires assessment of a prima facie case and that strong suspicion may justify trial without a mini-trial. They also state that alleged defects in an authorised valuation report are evidentiary matters, and fresh expert valuation is not ordinarily required; loss quantification mainly concerns the predicate offence.
Money-laundering prosecution is described as requiring a scheduled offence, proceeds of crime generated from that offence, and their projection as untainted, including knowing assistance in related processes. Challenges to investigation or discharge grounds in predicate offences are presented as outside the scope of the money-laundering proceeding. The notes explain that discharge requires assessment of a prima facie case and that strong suspicion may justify trial without a mini-trial. They also state that alleged defects in an authorised valuation report are evidentiary matters, and fresh expert valuation is not ordinarily required; loss quantification mainly concerns the predicate offence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.