Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Money-laundering prosecution is described as requiring a scheduled offence, proceeds of crime generated from that offence, and their projection as untainted, including knowing assistance in related processes. Challenges to investigation or discharge grounds in predicate offences are presented as outside the scope of the money-laundering proceeding. The notes explain that discharge requires assessment of a prima facie case and that strong suspicion may justify trial without a mini-trial. They also state that alleged defects in an authorised valuation report are evidentiary matters, and fresh expert valuation is not ordinarily required; loss quantification mainly concerns the predicate offence.
Money-laundering prosecution is described as requiring a scheduled offence, proceeds of crime generated from that offence, and their projection as untainted, including knowing assistance in related processes. Challenges to investigation or discharge grounds in predicate offences are presented as outside the scope of the money-laundering proceeding. The notes explain that discharge requires assessment of a prima facie case and that strong suspicion may justify trial without a mini-trial. They also state that alleged defects in an authorised valuation report are evidentiary matters, and fresh expert valuation is not ordinarily required; loss quantification mainly concerns the predicate offence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.