Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Statements recorded under section 108 acquire evidentiary value only through compliance with section 138B. The discussion explains that, except in specified exceptional circumstances, the statement-maker must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must determine that admission serves the interests of justice, and the affected person must receive an opportunity to cross-examine. Where these safeguards are not followed, statements cannot support penalties for export-destination misdeclaration, diversion of garment exports, or wrongful export incentives. It notes that penalties under sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside because they rested on statements treated as inadmissible.
Statements recorded under section 108 acquire evidentiary value only through compliance with section 138B. The discussion explains that, except in specified exceptional circumstances, the statement-maker must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must determine that admission serves the interests of justice, and the affected person must receive an opportunity to cross-examine. Where these safeguards are not followed, statements cannot support penalties for export-destination misdeclaration, diversion of garment exports, or wrongful export incentives. It notes that penalties under sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside because they rested on statements treated as inadmissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.