<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 108 statements require section 138B compliance, including examination and cross-examination, before supporting export-related penalties.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102017</link>
    <description>Statements recorded under section 108 acquire evidentiary value only through compliance with section 138B. The discussion explains that, except in specified exceptional circumstances, the statement-maker must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must determine that admission serves the interests of justice, and the affected person must receive an opportunity to cross-examine. Where these safeguards are not followed, statements cannot support penalties for export-destination misdeclaration, diversion of garment exports, or wrongful export incentives. It notes that penalties under sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside because they rested on statements treated as inadmissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 108 statements require section 138B compliance, including examination and cross-examination, before supporting export-related penalties.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102017</link>
      <description>Statements recorded under section 108 acquire evidentiary value only through compliance with section 138B. The discussion explains that, except in specified exceptional circumstances, the statement-maker must be examined before the adjudicating authority, the authority must determine that admission serves the interests of justice, and the affected person must receive an opportunity to cross-examine. Where these safeguards are not followed, statements cannot support penalties for export-destination misdeclaration, diversion of garment exports, or wrongful export incentives. It notes that penalties under sections 114(iii) and 114AA were set aside because they rested on statements treated as inadmissible.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 08:36:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>