Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Tender eligibility conditions based on financial...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Tender eligibility conditions based on financial creditworthiness may exclude companies whose Promoter Directors are defaulters or associated with non-performing credit facilities, because persons controlling a closely held company affect its commercial standing. The discussion treats a "Promoter Director" as extending beyond formal promoter classification to a person exercising direct or indirect control over management or policy, including through continuing executive functions. Tender terms remain within the contractual domain, with judicial review limited to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides or bias. A bidder that participates with knowledge of the conditions and undertakes compliance cannot ordinarily challenge them after disqualification. The reported decision found no manifest arbitrariness or Article 14 violation, while leaving the underlying question of default open in the pending writ petition.
Tender eligibility conditions based on financial creditworthiness may exclude companies whose Promoter Directors are defaulters or associated with non-performing credit facilities, because persons controlling a closely held company affect its commercial standing. The discussion treats a "Promoter Director" as extending beyond formal promoter classification to a person exercising direct or indirect control over management or policy, including through continuing executive functions. Tender terms remain within the contractual domain, with judicial review limited to arbitrariness, irrationality, mala fides or bias. A bidder that participates with knowledge of the conditions and undertakes compliance cannot ordinarily challenge them after disqualification. The reported decision found no manifest arbitrariness or Article 14 violation, while leaving the underlying question of default open in the pending writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.