Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Expiry of an e-way bill alone did not justify detention where the vehicle reached the relevant city within the permitted period but could not complete the short remaining journey because of a breakdown. In the absence of any indication of tax evasion, treating the lapse as sufficient for detention was characterised as improper and hyper-technical. The High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that all proceedings arising from the detention be dropped.
Expiry of an e-way bill alone did not justify detention where the vehicle reached the relevant city within the permitted period but could not complete the short remaining journey because of a breakdown. In the absence of any indication of tax evasion, treating the lapse as sufficient for detention was characterised as improper and hyper-technical. The High Court allowed the writ petition and directed that all proceedings arising from the detention be dropped.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.