Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Abetment of attempted export requires proof that the alleged abettor intentionally aided the offence by an act or unlawful omission; merely introducing an intermediary or being unable to secure that person's appearance does not establish participation in a smuggling conspiracy. A Customs House Agent's regulatory duties include verifying client identity and prescribed documentation, but do not require employees to inspect goods inside containers already examined and sealed by customs authorities. Accordingly, an employee who only arranged containers in the ordinary course of business could not be held liable for misdeclared prohibited goods without material connecting him to the conspiracy.
Abetment of attempted export requires proof that the alleged abettor intentionally aided the offence by an act or unlawful omission; merely introducing an intermediary or being unable to secure that person's appearance does not establish participation in a smuggling conspiracy. A Customs House Agent's regulatory duties include verifying client identity and prescribed documentation, but do not require employees to inspect goods inside containers already examined and sealed by customs authorities. Accordingly, an employee who only arranged containers in the ordinary course of business could not be held liable for misdeclared prohibited goods without material connecting him to the conspiracy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
