Abetment of prohibited exports requires intentional assistance, not mere negligence or failure to produce an intermediary before investigators.

Abetment in attempted export of prohibited goods requires instigation, intentional aid, conspiracy, or a wilful omission that facilitates the offence; negligence alone does not establish the necessary knowledge or intent. The discussion states that a Custom House Agent's employee who merely introduced an intermediary and arranged containers in ordinary forwarding work was not required to inspect customs-sealed contents. It further notes that responding to notices and providing contact details, while failing to secure the intermediary's appearance, does not by itself show participation in or knowledge of a smuggling conspiracy. The penalty is described as unsustainable on these facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether penalty for abetment of attempted export of prohibited goods could be sustained against a Custom House Agent's employee on allegations of negligence and failure to produce an intermediary before the investigating authority.

Analysis: Abetment requires instigation, intentional aid, conspiracy, or a wilful omission facilitating the prohibited act; negligence alone does not establish the requisite intention, knowledge, or deliberate assistance. The material showed only that the employee introduced the intermediary to a colleague and arranged containers in the ordinary course of forwarding business. The containers had been examined and sealed by the Bhutanese and Indian customs authorities, and a Custom House Agent was not obliged to inspect their contents. The employee responded to the show-cause notice, gave a statement and contact information, and no material established participation in, or knowledge of, the smuggling conspiracy. Failure of the intermediary to appear despite an assurance to produce him could not, by itself, constitute abetment.

Conclusion: The penalty was unsustainable; the issue was answered affirmatively in favour of the assessee and the penalty order was set aside.

---