Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.
Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.