<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Proceeds of crime classification upheld where claimed salary and loan receipts lacked supporting employment, loan, and repayment evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101970</link>
    <description>Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=913039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Proceeds of crime classification upheld where claimed salary and loan receipts lacked supporting employment, loan, and repayment evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101970</link>
      <description>Property provisionally attached may be treated as proceeds of crime where funds received from an entity allegedly involved in wrongful gains are not credibly explained as legitimate income or borrowing. The notes state that banking-channel transfers alone did not establish the claimed source of funds. A salary explanation lacked an appointment order, while the loan explanation lacked loan records or repayment evidence. On that basis, the receipt was not accepted as salary or loan and was characterised as proceeds of crime, resulting in confirmation of the provisional attachment and dismissal of the challenge.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 08:42:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>